Impact of vutrisiran on exploratory cardiac parameters in hereditary transthyretin-mediated amyloidosis with polyneuropathy.

AIMS: HELIOS-A was a Phase 3, open-label study of vutrisiran, an RNA interference therapeutic, in patients with hereditary transthyretin (ATTRv) amyloidosis with polyneuropathy. This analysis evaluated vutrisiran's impact on exploratory cardiac endpoints in HELIOS-A patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients were randomized 3:1 to subcutaneous vutrisiran 25 mg every 3 months or intravenous patisiran 0.3 mg/kg every 3 weeks (reference group) for 18 months. Exploratory cardiac endpoints included change from baseline in N-terminal prohormone of brain-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and echocardiographic parameters versus external placebo (APOLLO study). The modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population comprised randomized patients receiving any study drug (n = 122). A cardiac subpopulation with evidence of cardiac amyloid involvement (n = 40) was prespecified. 99mTc scintigraphy exploratory assessments in a planned vutrisiran-treated cohort at select sites were compared with baseline. At Month 18, vutrisiran demonstrated beneficial effects on NT-proBNP versus external placebo in the mITT and cardiac subpopulations (adjusted geometric mean fold change ratio [95% confidence interval] 0.480 [0.383-0.600], p = 9.606 × 10-10 and 0.491 [0.337-0.716], p = 0.0004, respectively). Benefits or trends towards benefit in echocardiographic parameters versus external placebo were observed for both populations. In 99mTc scintigraphy assessments, 32/47 (68.1%) and 31/48 (64.6%) patients exhibited reduced normalized left ventricular total uptake and heart-to-contralateral lung ratio, respectively. Perugini grade was reduced or unchanged versus baseline in 55/57 (96.5%) evaluable patients. No increase in cardiac adverse events was observed with vutrisiran versus external placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Vutrisiran demonstrated evidence of potential benefit on cardiac manifestations in patients with ATTRv amyloidosis with polyneuropathy, with an acceptable safety profile.

Three-year outcomes of de novo tacrolimus extended-release tablets (LCPT) compared to twice-daily tacrolimus in adult heart transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Extended-release tacrolimus for prophylaxis of allograft rejection in heart transplant (HT) recipients is currently not FDA-approved. One such extended-release formulation of tacrolimus known as LCPT allows once-daily dosing and improves bioavailability compared to immediate-release (IR-) tacrolimus. We compared long-term efficacy and safety of LCPT to IR-tacrolimus applied de novo in adult OHT recipients. METHODS: 25 prospective recipients on LCPT at our center from 2017 to 2019 were matched 1:2 with historical control recipients treated with IR-tacrolimus based on age, gender, and baseline creatinine. The primary composite outcome of death, acute cellular rejection, and/or new graft dysfunction within 3 years following transplant was compared between groups using non-inferiority analysis. RESULTS: LCPT demonstrated non-inferiority to IR-tacrolimus, with a primary outcome risk reduction of 16% (90%CI, -37%, -1%, non-inferiority p = 0.002) up to 3 years following heart transplant. Up to 3-years post-transplant, 14 patients remained on once-daily LCPT and 10 patients were switched to IR-tacrolimus due to lack of insurance coverage. There were no significant differences in the rate of chronic kidney disease requiring dialysis, cytomegalovirus requiring treatment, cardiac allograft vasculopathy, and malignancy within 3 years following transplant. CONCLUSION: LCPT is non-inferior in efficacy to IR-tacrolimus in heart transplantation with a similar safety profile. Narrowly-constrained FDA labels specific to kidney transplant remain a barrier to consistent access to many immunosuppressant medications for recipients of non-kidney solid organs. We recommend the FDA consider developing facile pathways for expanding the approved label of extended-release tacrolimus formulations to heart transplant recipients.

Impact of patisiran on health status and quality of life in patients with transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis

INTRODUCTION APOLLO-B is a Phase 3 study of patisiran in patients with transthyretin (ATTR) cardiac amyloidosis (NCT03997383), which demonstrated a significant benefit in functional capacity (6-MWT), and health status and quality of life (QoL) (KCCQ-OS) with patisiran vs placebo at Month (M) 12. HYPOTHESIS Patisiran improves health status and QoL in the daily lives of patients with ATTR cardiac amyloidosis vs placebo. METHODS Patients were 18-85 years old with ATTR amyloidosis and a medical history of heart failure (HF) due to ATTR cardiomyopathy, with ≥1 prior hospitalization for HF or current clinical evidence of HF. Patients were randomized (1:1) to intravenous patisiran 0.3 mg/kg or placebo every 3 weeks. These post-hoc analyses evaluated percentage of responders reporting ≥5-point improvement in KCCQ-OS, and change from baseline in 4 KCCQ domains and questions within the domains. RESULTS 359 patients received study drug (patisiran, N=181; placebo, N=178): median age (range), 76 (41, 85) years; male, 89%; wild-type ATTR, 80%; 25% were on tafamidis at baseline. At M12, patisiran showed significant benefit vs placebo in KCCQ-OS (LS mean [SEM] change from baseline: patisiran, 0.30 [1.26]; placebo, -3.41 [1.28]; LS mean [SEM] difference: 3.71 [1.80]; p=0.0397). A ≥ 5-point improvement in KCCQ at M12 was more frequent with patisiran vs placebo (34.1 vs 24.0%: difference [95% CI] 10.1% [0.7, 19.5]). Improvement vs placebo was consistent across domains, with LS mean differences [95% CI] in change from baseline (patisiran - placebo) in Physical Limitations (2.75 [-1.24, 6.74]), Total Symptoms (4.55 [0.75, 8.34]), QoL (4.27 [-0.12, 8.65]), and Social Limitations (2.76 [-2.21, 7.73]). Categorical changes from baseline to M12 demonstrated greater percentages of placebo-treated patients reporting worsening for questions in each domain, including activities requiring greater cardiometabolic demand. In patients with values at baseline and M12, notably greater percentages (>5%) of placebo- vs patisiran-treated patients reported worsening (percent difference; n=placebo/patisiran) for questions related to Walking 1 Block on Level Ground (10%; n=159/162), Frequency and Burden of Dyspnea (9.5% and 7.6%; n=164/170), Frequency of Orthopnea (9.6%; n=163/170), Feeling about Spending the Rest of Their Life with HF the Way It Is Right Now (6.4%; n=164/170), and Intimate Relationships (6.3%; n=88/86). Improvement from baseline was reported by greater percentages (>5%) of patisiran-treated patients (percent difference; n=patisiran/placebo) in Enjoyment of Life Limited Due to HF (12.8%; n=170/164) and Hobbies/Recreational Activities (6.0%; n=141/143). CONCLUSIONS In APOLLO-B, improvements in health status and QoL with patisiran vs placebo were apparent across all 4 KCCQ domains. Greater percentages of patisiran-treated patients had KCCQ-OS improved by ≥ 5 points at M12 and they more often reported improvements in QoL, and ability to enjoy life and perform hobbies/recreational activities. More placebo-treated patients reported worsening in walking on level ground, HF symptoms and QoL.

Patisiran Treatment in Patients with Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloidosis.

BACKGROUND: Transthyretin amyloidosis, also called ATTR amyloidosis, is associated with accumulation of ATTR amyloid deposits in the heart and commonly manifests as progressive cardiomyopathy. Patisiran, an RNA interference therapeutic agent, inhibits the production of hepatic transthyretin. METHODS: In this phase 3, double-blind, randomized trial, we assigned patients with hereditary, also known as variant, or wild-type ATTR cardiac amyloidosis, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive patisiran (0.3 mg per kilogram of body weight) or placebo once every 3 weeks for 12 months. A hierarchical procedure was used to test the primary and three secondary end points. The primary end point was the change from baseline in the distance covered on the 6-minute walk test at 12 months. The first secondary end point was the change from baseline to month 12 in the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-Overall Summary (KCCQ-OS) score (with higher scores indicating better health status). The second secondary end point was a composite of death from any cause, cardiovascular events, and change from baseline in the 6-minute walk test distance over 12 months. The third secondary end point was a composite of death from any cause, hospitalizations for any cause, and urgent heart failure visits over 12 months. RESULTS: A total of 360 patients were randomly assigned to receive patisiran (181 patients) or placebo (179 patients). At month 12, the decline in the 6-minute walk distance was lower in the patisiran group than in the placebo group (Hodges-Lehmann estimate of median difference, 14.69 m; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69 to 28.69; P = 0.02); the KCCQ-OS score increased in the patisiran group and declined in the placebo group (least-squares mean difference, 3.7 points; 95% CI, 0.2 to 7.2; P = 0.04). Significant benefits were not observed for the second secondary end point. Infusion-related reactions, arthralgia, and muscle spasms occurred more often among patients in the patisiran group than among those in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: In this trial, administration of patisiran over a period of 12 months resulted in preserved functional capacity in patients with ATTR cardiac amyloidosis. (Funded by Alnylam Pharmaceuticals; APOLLO-B ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03997383.).

Impact of Vutrisiran on Quality of Life and Physical Function in Patients with Hereditary Transthyretin-Mediated Amyloidosis with Polyneuropathy.

INTRODUCTION: Hereditary transthyretin (ATTRv; v for variant) amyloidosis, also known as hATTR amyloidosis, is a progressive and fatal disease associated with rapid deterioration of physical function and patients' quality of life (QOL). Vutrisiran, a subcutaneously administered RNA interference (RNAi) therapeutic that reduces hepatic production of transthyretin, was assessed in patients with ATTRv amyloidosis with polyneuropathy in the pivotal HELIOS-A study. METHODS: The phase 3 open-label HELIOS-A study investigated the efficacy and safety of vutrisiran in patients with ATTRv amyloidosis with polyneuropathy, compared with an external placebo group from the APOLLO study of the RNAi therapeutic patisiran. Measures of QOL and physical function were assessed. RESULTS: At month 18, vutrisiran improved Norfolk Quality of Life-Diabetic Neuropathy (Norfolk QOL-DN) total score (least squares mean difference [LSMD] in change from baseline [CFB]: -21.0; p = 1.84 × 10-10) and Norfolk QOL-DN domain scores, compared with external placebo. This benefit relative to external placebo was evident across all baseline polyneuropathy disability (PND) scores and most pronounced in patients with baseline PND scores I-II. Compared with external placebo, vutrisiran also demonstrated benefit in EuroQoL-Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS) score (LSMD in CFB: 13.7; nominal p = 2.21 × 10-7), 10-m walk test (LSMD in CFB: 0.239 m/s; p = 1.21 × 10-7), Rasch-built Overall Disability Score (LSMD in CFB: 8.4; p = 3.54 × 10-15), and modified body mass index (mBMI) (LSMD in CFB: 140.7; p = 4.16 × 10-15) at month 18. Overall, Norfolk QOL-DN, EQ-VAS, and mBMI improved from pretreatment baseline with vutrisiran, whereas all measures worsened from baseline in the external placebo group. At month 18, Karnofsky Performance Status was stable/improved from baseline in 58.2/13.1% with vutrisiran versus 34.7/8.1% with external placebo. CONCLUSION: Vutrisiran treatment provided significant clinical benefits in multiple measures of QOL and physical function in patients with ATTRv amyloidosis with polyneuropathy. Benefits were most pronounced in patients with earlier-stage disease, highlighting the importance of early diagnosis and treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03759379.

Trends in Hospital Admissions for Systolic and Diastolic Heart Failure in the United States Between 2004 and 2017.

Heart failure (HF) affects 6 million people in the United States and costs $30 billion annually. It is unclear whether improvements in length of stay and mortality over the last few decades hold true for both systolic and diastolic HF. To better assess the epidemiological and economic burden of HF, we assessed the trends in outcomes and costs for both systolic and diastolic HF. We identified hospitalizations for systolic and diastolic HF in the National Inpatient Sample database and evaluated trends over the period from 2004 to 2017, adjusting for demographics and co-morbidities. The proportion of patients admitted with an exacerbation of systolic HF increased from 42% to 63% over the study period. We found an overall decreasing trend between 2004 and 2011 in the length of stay for HF in general with a sharper decrease in diastolic than systolic HF. Inpatient mortality decreased between 2004 and 2007 and stabilized between 2008 and 2016. Systolic HF was associated with higher mortality than diastolic HF. The total inflation-adjusted cost did not change significantly over the study period, with systolic HF costing, on average, $3,036 more than diastolic HF per admission. In conclusion, systolic HF overtook diastolic HF, accounting for most HF hospitalizations in 2008. The higher hospitalization costs for systolic HF relative to diastolic HF may have resulted, in part, from greater use of advanced support devices in patients with systolic HF.

De novo tacrolimus extended-release tablets (LCPT) versus twice-daily tacrolimus in adult heart transplantation: Results of a single-center non-inferiority matched control trial.

Extended-release tacrolimus for prophylaxis of allograft rejection in orthotopic heart transplant (OHT) recipients is currently not FDA-approved. One such extended-release formulation of tacrolimus known as LCPT allows once-daily dosing and improves bioavailability compared to immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-tacrolimus). We compared the efficacy and safety of LCPT to IR-tacrolimus applied de novo in adult OHT recipients. Twenty-five prospective recipients on LCPT at our center from 2017 to 2019 were matched 1:2 with historical control recipients treated with IR-tacrolimus based on age, gender, and baseline creatinine. The primary composite outcome of death, acute cellular rejection, and/or new graft dysfunction within 1 year was compared using non-inferiority analysis. LCPT demonstrated non-inferiority to IR-tacrolimus, with a primary outcome risk reduction of 20% (90% CI: -40%, -.5%; non-inferiority P = .001). Tacrolimus trough levels peaked at 2-3 months and were higher in LCPT (median 14.5 vs. 12.7 ng/ml; P = .03) with similar dose levels (LCPT vs. IR-tacrolimus: .08 vs. .09 mg/kg/day; P = .33). Cardiovascular-related readmissions were reduced by 62% (P = .046) in LCPT patients. The complication rate per transplant admission and all-cause readmission rate did not differ significantly. These results suggest that LCPT is non-inferior in efficacy to IR-tacrolimus with a similar safety profile and improved bioavailability in OHT.

Bradycardia in Recent Heart Transplant: Will the Microscope Illuminate the True Answer?CME.

Transplant recipients are at risk of developing rejection that may cause significant morbidity and mortality following transplantation The clinical presentation of rejection may be atypical, leading to difficulties in diagnosis and management especially in cases with a nondiagnostic biopsy specimen. The emergence of artificial intelligence may aid in clinical decision making when traditional techniques are inconclusive.

Trends in post-heart transplant biopsies for graft rejection versus nonrejection.

With alternatives such as gene profiling available for surveillance after orthotopic heart transplantation, we sought to evaluate the utilization of endomyocardial biopsies (EMBs) for hospitalized patients after heart transplantation. Surveillance EMBs in patients with and without complications were evaluated from the 2004 to 2014 National Inpatient Sample. Over the study period, there was no significant change in the number of EMB procedures performed (P = 0.44). Of 37,955 EMBs, 2283 (6%) were in the setting of graft complications, while 35,672 EMBs were not related to graft complications. EMBs in graft complications did not show a significant increase in length of stay over time (P = 0.06), but had a significant increase in cost over time (P = 0.001). However, those with graft complications had an average of a 5-day longer length of stay (P < 0.001) and costs that were $88,816 (P < 0.001) more expensive compared with those without graft complications. In conclusion, the vast majority of in-hospital EMBs were not related to heart transplantation complications. Nevertheless, EMB hospitalizations with graft complications showed significantly greater length of stay and cost. With the COVID-19 pandemic, it seems more effective to use minimal-contact health surveillance methods rather than invasive EMBs.

Community-Acquired Acute Kidney Injury as a Risk Factor of de novo Heart Failure Hospitalization.

OBJECTIVES: Because patients with hospital-acquired acute kidney injury (AKI) are at risk for subsequent development of heart failure (HF) and little is known about the relation between community-acquired AKI (CA-AKI) and HF, we sought to determine if CA-AKI is a risk factor for incident HF hospitalization. METHODS: We utilized Baylor Scott & White Health databases at the primary care and inpatient hospitalization levels to identify adults without a prior history of HF who had 2 or more serum creatinine measurements within 13 months in the primary care setting. We defined CA-AKI as a serum creatinine increase ≥0.3 mg/dL or ≥1.5 times the baseline for consecutive values within a 13-month period. We created a flag for de novo HF hospitalization at 90, 180, and 365 days following CA-AKI evaluation. RESULTS: In the analyses, 210,895 unique adults were included, of whom 5,358 (2.5%) had CA-AKI. Those with CA-AKI had higher rates of comorbidities, higher rate of males (48 vs. 42%, p < 0.001), and were older (61.5 [50.3, 73.1] vs. 54.1 [42.8, 64.7] years, p < 0.001) than those who did not have CA-AKI. In total, 607 (0.3%), 833 (0.4%), and 1,089 (0.5%) individuals had an incident HF hospitalization in the 90, 180, and 365 days following the CA-AKI evaluation, respectively. After adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics, patients with CA-AKI had >2 times the risk of de novo HF hospitalization compared with patients who did not have CA-AKI (90 days: 2.35 [1.83-3.02], p < 0.001; 180 days: 2.52 [2.04-3.13], p < 0.001; 365 days: 2.16 [1.77-2.64], p < 0.001). These multivariable models yielded strong predictive abilities, with the areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curve >0.90. CONCLUSION: After controlling for baseline and clinical characteristics, patients with CA-AKI were at approximately twofold the risk of de novo HF hospitalization (within 90, 180, and 365 days) compared with those who did not have CA-AKI. Hence, detecting CA-AKI may provide an opportunity for early intervention at the primary care level to possibly delay HF development.

Donor predicted heart mass as predictor of primary graft dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Concern over the hazards associated with undersized donor hearts has impeded the utilization of otherwise viable allografts for transplantation. Previous studies have indicated predicted heart mass (PHM) may provide better size matching in cardiac transplantation than total body weight (TBW). We investigated whether size-matching donor hearts by PHM is a better predictor of primary graft dysfunction (PGD) than matching by TBW. METHODS: Records of consecutive adult cardiac transplants performed between 2012 and 2016 at a single-center academic hospital were reviewed. We compared patients implanted with hearts undersized by ≥30% with those implanted with donor hearts matched for size (within 30%), and performed the analysis both for undersizing by PHM and for undersizing by TBW. The primary outcome was moderate/severe PGD within 24 hours, according to the 2014 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation consensus. Secondary outcome was 1-year survival. RESULTS: Of 253 patients, 21 (8%) and 30 (12%) received hearts undersized by TBW and PHM, respectively. The overall rate of moderate/severe PGD was 13% (33 patients). PGD was associated with undersizing if performed by PHM (p = 0.007), but not if performed by TBW (p = 0.49). One-year survival was not different between groups (log-rank, p > 0.8). Multivariate analysis confirmed that undersizing donor hearts by PHM, but not by TBW, was predictive of moderate/severe PGD (OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.3 to 8.6). CONCLUSIONS: Undersized donor hearts by ≥30% by PHM may increase rates of PGD after transplantation, confirming that PHM provides more clinically appropriate size matching than TBW. Better size matching may ultimately allow for expanding the donor pool.

Validation of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter-Derived Fick Cardiac Outputs in Patients with Heart Failure.

The pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) remains the gold standard to calculate Fick cardiac outputs (FCOs) in patients with heart failure admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). The peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) provides long-term intravenous access and is used outside the ICU; however, there is scant literature validating venous oxygen saturations (VOSs) from PICC lines. Heart failure patients in the ICU with an existing PAC requiring a PICC line to transition were enrolled. Three blood samples were taken per person (1 at PICC, 1 at central venous pressure [CVP], and 1 at distal PAC). We performed repeated measures analysis of variance, as well as reliability analysis on 31 subjects (77% male, 71% Caucasian, mean ± standard deviation age 60 ± 8 years, 80% on inotropes). The average VOSs were 62 ± 11%, 62 ± 12%, and 61 ± 9% for the PICC line, CVP, and distal port, respectively (p = 0.66); there was excellent reliability (0.79). The median FCOs were 5 [4, 6], 5 [4, 6], and 5 [4, 6] L/min at the PICC, CVP, and distal port, respectively (p = 0.91); there was fair-to-good reliability (0.67). In conclusion, VOS and FCO did not differ by location, on average. Reliable data may be obtained through the PICC line, after evaluation from the PAC. The PICC may provide longer-term hemodynamic assessment while improving patient comfort.

Utilization of high donor sequence number grafts in cardiac transplantation.

Donor sequence number (DSN) represents the number of candidates to whom a graft was offered and declined prior to acceptance for transplantation. We sought to investigate the outcomes of patients receiving high DSN grafts. Consecutive isolated adult cardiac transplantations performed at a single-center were reviewed. Recipients were grouped into standard (≤75th percentile) DSN and high (>75th percentile) DSN. A previously validated donor risk index was used to quantify the risk associated with donor grafts, and recipient outcomes were assessed. Overall, 254 patients were included: 194 standard DSN (range 1-79) and 60 high DSN (range 82-1723). High DSN grafts were harvested at greater distance (P < .001) with increased ischemia time (P < .001), resulting in a modest increase in donor risk index (1 point median difference, P = .014). High DSN recipients were less frequently listed as UNOS status 1A (P < .001). Despite a nonsignificant trend toward increased in-hospital/30-day mortality in high DSN recipients, there were no differences in primary graft dysfunction or 1-year survival (high DSN 89% vs standard DSN 88%, P = .82). After adjustment for risk factors, high DSN was not associated with increased 1-year mortality (hazard ratio 1.18, 95%-CI 0.54-2.58, P = .68).

Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia: An Under-recognized Form of Inherited Cardiomyopathy.

We report a case of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia (ARVD) in order to evaluate the course of an under-recognized form of cardiomyopathy with a vast array of clinical manifestations. The patient is a 49-year-old white woman transferred from an outside hospital due to dyspnea and persistent hypoxia. She had a pertinent family history that included a sister who died suddenly in her 30s from unexplained heart failure. Initial work-up for hypoxia was unrevealing. Transthoracic echocardiography revealed isolated right ventricular dysfunction with dilation and multiple trabeculations. Further investigation, including cardiac computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, revealed fatty infiltration into the right ventricular wall suggestive of ARVD.

Effectiveness and Safety of the Impella 5.0 as a Bridge to Cardiac Transplantation or Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device.

Many patients with end-stage heart failure require mechanical circulatory support as a temporizing measure to enable multidisciplinary assessment for the most suitable therapeutic strategy. Impella 5.0 can be used as a bridge to decision to evaluate patients for potential recovery or bridge to next therapy (bridge to heart transplantation [BTHT] or bridge to durable left ventricular assist device or VAD [BLVAD]. Our goal was to examine single-center outcomes with the Impella 5.0 device as a bridge to next therapy (BTHT or BTLVAD). Forty patients underwent Impella 5.0 support from December 2009 to December 2015 with the intent of BTHT (n = 20) or BTLVAD (n = 20). The primary end point was survival to next therapy. Secondary end points included hemodynamic assessments and in-hospital/30-day complications. All patients were inotrope-dependent, with severely depressed left ventricular ejection fraction (12%) and renal insufficiency (creatinine 2.0 mg/dl). Most were Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) 2 (66%) with biventricular failure (65%). Thirty patients (75%) survived to next therapy, including transplant (n = 13), durable LVAD (n = 15), and recovery of native heart function (n = 2). No strokes or major bleeding events requiring surgery were observed. Acute renal dysfunction, bleeding requiring transfusion, hemolysis, device malfunction, limb ischemia occurred in 13 (33%), 11 (28%), 3 (8%), 4 (10%), and 1 (3%) patients, respectively. Survival rate to discharge and/or 30 days was 68% (27 of 40). Temporary support with the Impella 5.0 allows for an effective bridge to decision strategy for hemodynamic stabilization and multidisciplinary heart team assessment of critically ill patients with heart failure. In conclusion, many of these patients can be subsequently bridged to the next therapy with favorable outcomes.